The problem of whiplash in car
insurance
05 Dec 2011
The UK has the highest number of car
insurance whiplash claims in
Europe. This high rate has much to do with the ease with which such
claims can be brought at no financial risk to the claimant and the
effectiveness of claims management companies and injury lawyers at
encouraging accident victims to bring them.
Whiplash is not one medical condition, but a range of neck injuries
caused by sudden acceleration and deceleration of the neck. The best
known classification of the severity of injury was published by the
Quebec Task Force more than ten years ago, graded as follows:
|
Grading of Whiplash (Quebec Task Force)
Grade 0: no neck pain, stiffness, or
any physical signs are noticed
Grade 1: neck
complaints of pain, stiffness or tenderness only but no physical signs
are noted by the examining physician.
Grade 2: neck
complaints and the examining physician finds decreased range of motion
and point tenderness in the neck.
Grade 3: neck
complaints plus neurological signs such as decreased deep tendon
reflexes, weakness and sensory deficits.
Grade 4: neck
complaints and fracture or dislocation, or injury to the spinal cord.
|
As the above grading shows, except in very severe cases where there
would be 'hard' clinical signs of injury, the doctor has to rely on
'soft' signs and symptoms that the patient can easily manipulate.
Injury lawyers, of course, get to know the various approaches of their
panel of medical experts, most of them orthopaedic surgeons, and learn
to match their medical experts to specific clients to maximum effect.
While, presumably, most of these cases are genuine and the degree of
symptomatology is fairly presented; a porportion will be exaggerated or
fictitious and it is that group, which insurers believe to be sizeable,
that needs to be addressed.
It has been suggested that the rules of evidence should be changed
(including by Jack Straw in his Motor Insurance Regulation Bill) so
that the presence of symptomatic whiplash-related injury has to be
objectively demonstrated as an alternative to the current situation
whereby unless
a liable car insurance company can prove its absence, compensation must
be paid as, in practice, whiplash injury is deemed to be present if supported by a medical expert's report that
declares the claimant symptomatic.
While this change probably would make it slightly harder for the
have-a-go fraudster to make a successsful claim, in reality, little
changes if the claim is medically backed up.
Thatcham, the car insurance industry-funded research unit, has
developed
a Whiplash
Injury Toolkit (WITKit) designed to help to identify those cases
unlikely to be genuine but it needs further development before it will
be of much use in individual cases.
In our report Tackling
the High Cost of Car Insurance - Strategic Review, we have
suggested that Thatcham might usefully fund a medically-led research
programme to review current international research evidence (there's a
lot of it) and undertake new research on whiplash victims as
appropriate, particularly in the light of evolving modern investigative
techniques, with a view to developing more rigorous assessement
protocols that would assist clinicians to more accurately diagnose it.
It is, of course, a hard task to tighten up on diagnosis, a task that
has proved impossible when other researchers have investigated it. It
also has to be said that historically industry-funded whiplash research
that has not been helpful to the industry has been suppresed.
Nonetheless, the UK leads the way internationally in its scientific
rigour when conducting meta-analyses of this nature as well as in the
conduct of this kind of research; so there is every reason to suppose
that if there are to be any useful developments in this area that they
could indeed come from suitably funded UK research.
Given the high cost of settling whiplash claims in the UK, it is
logical, although not ideal in view of their vested interest, that this
funding should come from the insurance industry itself.
It has to be said that there is a lot of misundersanding in relation to
what can realistically be done about whiplash for the reasons we review
in a separate article: The complexities
of whiplash.
For anyone keen to keep down insurance costs that are inflated by
excessive whiplash claims, you can compare car
insurance companies and brokers below.
|