Transport Committee Report on
Car Insurance - Review
31 Jan 2011
In our blog, Transport Committee Report
on the Cost of Motor Insurance,
we summarised the findings and recommendations of the Transport Select
Committee's enquiry into the high cost of motor insurance, to which we
refer the interested reader in advance of perusal of our review
comments below.
Since the publication of the Committee's report, the Government has
decided to press ahead with the Jackson reforms, although, as expected,
they are not planning to scrap referral fees. They have therefore not
heeded the Committee's advice to hold back and undertake research into
the possible effects on access to justice. From the point of reference
of this website, the Government's haste is in the car insurance
consumer's interest as it brings forward the date that the Jackson
recommendations will start to help insurers to reduce the cost of car
insurance.
While the committee's recommendation that insurance companies make
their payments of referral fees known to consumers is sound, they
missed the opportunity to recommend an outright ban on them. The
evidence presented to them by expert witnesses on this issue was
contradictory, perhaps leading them to the view that there was no basis
to recommend a ban. However, some of the evidence presented to the
Committee, that stood up well to objective scrutiny, confirmed that
referral fees are not a necessary component of the claims market and
that they lead to uneconomic referral patterns. It is therefore
regretable that they felt unable to be more bold.
The Committee responded sensibly to the rising level of car insurance
fraud, supporting the development of new joint policing intitiatives
with the insurance industry while flagging up the need to learn as much
as possible from other countries' experiences.
All in all, it was a reasonable, if slightly restrained response to the
evidence with which they were presented.
|